SAP LT Replication Server · Transformations

A non-ABAP source (e.g. Microsoft SQL Server) is replicating into SAP HANA via SLT. What extra mapping layer is introduced compared with an ABAP source?

Sign in to see the full answer — free to start on the web.

This is one card from the KnowCard library. The full way to learn it — spaced-repetition review, progress tracking, and AI explanations — lives in the KnowCard app, free to start on the web. iOS & Android are coming soon.

Get started — it’s free

Already have an account? Sign in →

More in Transformations

How is a filter rule in SLT actually implemented under the hood, and how does it relate to transformation rules?
A DBA wants to add SLT filter rules to reduce load on the source system and speed up replication. Why won't that work?
For heterogeneous SLT landscapes, where do you find the authoritative list of supported source/target database type mapping combinations?
In an SLT event-based rule, what are the two ways to supply the ABAP logic?
A stakeholder wants to use SAP LT Replication Server to do heavy multi-source cleansing, joins and enrichment like a full ETL job. Why is that the wrong tool choice?
When is SLT the better place to perform a data transformation rather than fixing the data in the source system?