SAP on AWS · Resilience: HA, DR & Service Levels for SAP

Two Well-Architected reliability principles are easy to confuse: one makes recovery efficient, the other proves it works. Name both, and give the caveat each carries for SAP.

Answer locked. Get the free KnowCard app to reveal it — plus spaced-repetition review so it actually sticks.

This is one card from the KnowCard library — thousands more across SAP, Linux, Python and more. In the app you get the answer, AI explanations, and cards that come back right before you would forget them. Free to start on iOS, Android or the web.

More in Resilience: HA, DR & Service Levels for SAP

Your SAP stack has an app server at 99.5% and a HANA DB across AZs at 99.99%. A colleague says the composite SLA is 99.5% (the weakest link). Why is that wrong, and which way does the real number move?

The business signed for 99.95% S/4HANA uptime. Your AWS infrastructure SLAs all clear that bar. Why can you still breach the business-uptime SLA, and what closes the gap?

Name the four single-region HA/DR patterns for SAP and the one property that separates the 99.5% pair from the 99.99% / ~0-RPO pair.

If a single AWS transit center inside a region fails, do instances in one AZ lose connectivity to another AZ? Why or why not, and what does the answer let you trust?

An auditor asks who is accountable when S/4HANA is unavailable: AWS's service SLA or the MSP's SLA. How do the two differ in scope, and which one covers a misconfiguration outage?

You have a tightly integrated SAP system group (ERP, BW, CRM, SRM, GTS). Every per-system RPO is met on failover, yet finance reports cross-system data is inconsistent. Which objective did you miss, and what does it demand?

Start learning today

Free to start — download the app or use it in your browser.