SAP on AWS · Security & Compliance for SAP on AWS

AWS recommends layering both a NACL and a security group around SAP instances. What's the difference that makes each one necessary?

Answer locked. Get the free KnowCard app to reveal it — plus spaced-repetition review so it actually sticks.

This is one card from the KnowCard library — thousands more across SAP, Linux, Python and more. In the app you get the answer, AI explanations, and cards that come back right before you would forget them. Free to start on iOS, Android or the web.

More in Security & Compliance for SAP on AWS

You're protecting SAP traffic in transit on AWS. Why isn't SSL/TLS the answer for every connection, and what decides which mechanism a given link uses?

You want SAP GUI SSO via X.509 and your org mandates certificates chained to your own private root CA. Why might SAP Secure Login Service for GUI (SLSG) be the wrong choice, and what's the alternative?

A user is allowed to launch EC2 instances. Why does omitting an iam:PassRole restriction let them escalate their own privileges, and how does PassRole close it?

You need to find which security groups expose the SAP message server port (tcp 3600 for instance 00) across your estate. Why doesn't the AWS Config dashboard answer this, and what does?

You must keep a platform service (reached via an ENI) and S3 access off the public internet. Why won't a private subnet + NAT do it, and what's the right control? Also: how do AWS services split into the three VPC-perimeter categories?

A consultant secures SAP on AWS the way they would on-premise: tighten user accounts and authorizations. What does this miss about the AWS authorization model?

Start learning today

Free to start — download the app or use it in your browser.