Central Governance: UI Modeling

A UIBB needs bundled business logic (a notes/attachment block with its own events and error handling), not just a form template. Is that a GUIBB or a RUIBB, and what must it implement?

You have an arbitrary Web Dynpro component and want Floorplan Manager to drive it as a UIBB. Which interface must the component implement?

In a Floorplan Manager UIBB, what is the specific job of the feeder class (versus the GenIL/SPI layer)?

Two mechanisms connect UIBBs at runtime: wiring and the MDG communicator settings. What does each one actually do?

You're building a brand-new single-object maintenance UI in MDG. Should you use the OIF or the OVP floorplan?

When do you pick the OVP floorplan versus the GAF floorplan for an MDG activity?

The QAF shows just the minimum required fields of an object. Which Web Dynpro component actually implements it?

An OVP for a material has hundreds of fields and loads slowly. What OVP-level configuration lever reduces the initial load cost?

Which integration framework sits under the Material master UI versus under the Business Partner and Finance UIs — and why does it matter?

In the material SPI, what's the division of labor between CL_MDG_BS_MAT_MP and CL_MDG_BS_MAT_SP?

For the business partner domain, may you enhance the generated GenIL objects directly to change UI behavior?

When a data model is activated, how does GenIL map a type 1 entity versus a type 4 entity?

Where do the GenIL objects for Customer and Supplier master data live — a separate component each?

The finance domain exposes two GenIL components, MDGF and MDGFHP. What is MDGFHP specifically for?

You want a different UI layout for each central-governance workflow step. Should you build a separate application configuration per step, or use CBA?

A guide tells you to enhance single-processing UIs with the BAdI "Adjust User Interfaces for Single Processing" (component USMD_ENTITY_VALUE2). Any reason not to?

Most MDG central-governance screens are Web Dynpro FPM apps. Which business-partner search app is the exception, and what is it built on?

You want a UI change to apply to every user in a client but only that client. Is that Customizing or Personalizing — and what can each layer NOT do?

Both Customizing and Enhancement survive upgrades. So what actually separates them?

Why is Copy Application Configuration (Deep-Copy) discouraged for adapting an MDG UI?

Why is Modification discouraged as an MDG UI adaptation approach?

Deep-Copy and Modification are both discouraged, but for opposite reasons. What's the contrast?

You need a different UI depending on the change-request type or workflow step at runtime. What does Context-Based Adaptation (CBA) give you that a static config can't?

Before any MDG UI configuration will work, what data-model prerequisite must be satisfied and registered?

To auto-populate change-request header fields (description, reason, due date) and make some of them required, do you use a BAdI or BRFplus?

MDG uses both Web Dynpro and SAP Fiori. Which UI technology backs central governance versus consolidation and mass processing?

You need to add a node/attribute to the material master UI. Since material uses SPI (not GenIL), where must that enhancement be done?