SAP Solution Manager 7.2 · Solution Documentation: Solution Structure (Branches & Sites)

What does the product/version-independence of a Logical Component Group let you include in a solution, and who else reuses it?

Because an LCG connects to no technical info directly, you can bring any SAP or non-SAP system into a solution's end-to-end process definition.

The same LCG is reused by different consumers: documenting the solution and configuring ChaRM's change control landscape (a set of LCGs under a shared release cycle).

This is one card from the KnowCard library. The full way to learn it — spaced-repetition review, progress tracking, and AI explanations — lives in the KnowCard app. We’re in private beta now; iOS & Android are coming soon.

Join the private beta

Already a tester? Sign in →

More in Solution Documentation: Solution Structure (Branches & Sites)

How do branch inheritance and releasing changes work in 7.2 Solution Documentation?
What is a 'solution' in 7.2 content management, and what's the best-practice number to use?
What does a classic five-system ERP landscape look like in LCG terms?
What's the best practice on how many branches to create, and why have multiple project teams share one?
How does a Logical Component Group let non-technical users connect a process to systems, and what do its logical components represent?
What does a 'conflict' lifecycle state mean for a SolDoc element, and why does the maintenance branch take priority?