SAP Solution Manager 7.2 · Retrofit

Why must you NOT independently build the same BW query/object in both the maintenance and innovation dev systems, even if each retrofits cleanly?

Answer locked. Get the free KnowCard app to reveal it — plus spaced-repetition review so it actually sticks.

Get it on App StoreGet it on Google Play

This is one card from the KnowCard library — thousands more across SAP, Linux, Python and more. In the app you get the answer, AI explanations, and cards that come back right before you would forget them. Free to start on iOS, Android or the web.

More in Retrofit

Which scenarios force a manual retrofit instead of an automatic or semiautomatic one?
A change was successfully tested in the maintenance dev system of an N/N+1 dual landscape but was NOT retrofitted into the innovation dev system. What happens at the next release cutover?
Automatic retrofit into the N+1 dev system fails to land its objects. What prerequisite container is most likely missing?
Correction Workbench retrofit shows a green Confirm-Changes light. Why is it still wrong to skip verifying the merged object?
An object has no conflict in the N+1 dev system. Is that enough to guarantee automatic retrofit?
Which objects qualify for Retrofit's automatic import, and which look eligible but are excluded?

Start learning today

Free to start — download the app or use it in your browser.

Get it on App StoreGet it on Google Play